According to Moral Objectivism, what is asserted about moral principles?

Moral Objectivism asserts that certain moral principles have universal validity, meaning they are inherent and applicable to all people, regardless of cultural or societal differences. This perspective holds that while individual beliefs about morality may differ, there exist fundamental truths about right and wrong that transcend personal or cultural opinions. Those who adhere to moral objectivism believe that these principles can provide a common framework for evaluating moral situations, fostering dialogue and understanding among diverse groups.

In contrast, the other options present perspectives that do not align with the core tenets of moral objectivism. The idea that moral principles vary widely by culture suggests a relativistic approach, which contradicts the notion of universal truths. The assertion that all ethical decisions are subjective leans toward moral relativism as well, implying that moral judgments are solely based on personal feelings or societal norms. Lastly, stating that moral principles are primarily determined by laws situates morality within legal constructs rather than recognizing inherent moral truths, which is a key element of moral objectivism.