What determines right and wrong according to moral objectivism?

Moral objectivism asserts that there are universal moral absolutes that apply to all individuals, regardless of their personal beliefs or cultural contexts. This philosophy maintains that certain actions are inherently right or wrong based on objective standards, rather than subjective interpretations or opinions.

The principle of universal moral absolutes in moral objectivism indicates that there exist ethical truths that can be discovered and recognized, akin to truths in science or mathematics. This perspective underlines the idea that moral principles are not merely products of social consensus, cultural traditions, or individual beliefs. Instead, they are stable, immutable standards that serve as a guide for moral reasoning and ethical behavior across different societies and personal perspectives.

In contrast, social consensus, cultural traditions, and personal beliefs represent subjective frameworks where moral judgments can vary widely. Each of these alternatives relies on differing views and agreements within a specific group or culture, which can fluctuate over time and fail to provide the same level of moral certainty that moral objectivism seeks to deliver. This makes the concept of universal moral absolutes a cornerstone for those who advocate for moral objectivism.